Posted by:
StevePerry
at Mon Apr 15 21:07:32 2013 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by StevePerry ]
Frank, That is quite possibly the best post you have made,at least that I have read.
Thank you
Please understand that you on several occasions have asked some of us to take your word on something "just because" without sharing the valuable info that you have. you can't blame me for questioning you. We have never met and until this last post, i have never seen anything to substantiate your opinions. This post gave me something that made me say "that makes sense" and thus more likely to agree. It's not just you either, I don't use a lot of info commonly found on hognose care sheets because of my own observations. I like to understand "why" I am doing what I'm doing and not just do. I may never fully understand the "why", but I have to try.
I do have other questions that I think your field studies are going to miss though and that is that your study groups appear to all be in the same harsh environment.
Do you think it possible that in other areas, the average data of; depth, temp & humidity levels would be largely different? For example, the date from your area may be that depths average, 14" to 23" with a temp range of 60 to 80. Do you think, or would you be surprised that in a northern region those numbers could be 6" to 16" with temps ranging from 70 to 85?(This is an honest question, not a set up) ----- Steve Perry
facebook.com/StevePerryReptiles
[ Hide Replies ]
|