![]() | market - home |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to General / Open Discussion ] |
Posted by: kanuck at Tue Oct 7 11:24:43 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by kanuck ] I think it has a lot to do with Bush's credibility. I think we were lied to about why Iraq was invaded. The U.S. Government has already backed off it's assertion that Saddam had ties to Osama Bin Laden(see statements by Cheney and Bush). No Weapons of mass desruction have ever been found and many government officials(Albright, Kennedy, et al) are questioning the validity of that claim. So I'm curious, why did Bush go in? Can you formulate a coherent paragraph outlining why and support it with something from a reputable source. All my little quotes come off of CNN's website. Try it, try not going off on one of your usual rants and come up with something concrete. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Once again, you add nothing substantial. - ScottishCLK, Tue Oct 7 11:40:24 2003 >> Next Message: Is Sammy Sosa "substantial"? - DevinP, Tue Oct 7 11:51:39 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: Correction" protect, not protest - DevinP, Tue Oct 7 11:15:18 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|