"In the case of that conda to normal, producing all condas, if that occurs a couple more times. I would question the genetics of the normal."

FR.
I will repeat what I posted earlier.
Firstly, because it's a very cute point that I think may have been missed by many people and certainly would be appreciated by the more mathematically minded.
Secondly, because your above comment is incorrect.

If both parents were anacondas, the probability of all six being condas would have been exactly the same as if one was a conda and one was a normal - about 1.5 %.

As Troy pointed out, for each baby it would be 1/4 for super and 1/4 for normal. Therefore, it would still have been 1/2 for anaconda.

[ Hide Replies ]

• anery / axanthic? - geckoejon, Sun Jun 30 19:01:36 2013
• RE: anery / axanthic? - geckoejon, Sun Jun 30 19:08:13 2013
• RE: anery / axanthic? - FR, Sun Jun 30 20:48:04 2013
• RE: anery / axanthic? - Rextiles, Sun Jun 30 22:19:47 2013
• Good Stuff - RG, Mon Jul 1 09:39:52 2013
• RE: Good Stuff - Rextiles, Mon Jul 1 14:59:05 2013
• RE: Good Stuff - FR, Tue Jul 2 12:43:35 2013
• RE: Good Stuff - RG, Tue Jul 2 15:20:54 2013
• RE: Good Stuff - DMong, Wed Jul 3 14:37:13 2013
• RE: anery / axanthic? - FR, Mon Jul 1 09:55:19 2013
• RE: anery / axanthic? - FR, Mon Jul 1 14:59:50 2013
• Defining Axanthism - Rextiles, Mon Jul 1 16:48:17 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - FR, Tue Jul 2 09:54:19 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - caracal, Tue Jul 2 19:59:57 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - FR, Wed Jul 3 09:58:34 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - caracal, Wed Jul 3 19:14:30 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - FR, Sun Jul 7 09:28:02 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - caracal, Sun Jul 7 11:07:40 2013
• Pearls of Wisdom!!!! - RG, Mon Jul 8 10:08:24 2013
• RE: Pearls of Wisdom!!!! - DMong, Mon Jul 8 11:11:50 2013
• RE: Pearls of Wisdom!!!! - caracal, Mon Jul 8 12:43:37 2013
• RE: Pearls of Wisdom!!!! - caracal, Mon Jul 8 12:47:46 2013
• Lessons learned (again) - Rextiles, Sun Jul 7 14:42:25 2013
• RE: Lessons learned (again) - DISCERN, Sun Jul 7 15:36:16 2013
• RE: Lessons learned (again) - Rextiles, Sun Jul 7 21:31:51 2013
• RE: Lessons learned (again) - DMong, Mon Jul 8 10:58:09 2013
• RE: Defining Axanthism - caracal, Wed Jul 3 19:33:33 2013
• On Anaconda probabilities... - Rextiles, Thu Jul 4 02:46:02 2013
• RE: On Anaconda probabilities... - caracal, Thu Jul 4 04:34:24 2013
• RE: On Anaconda probabilities... - Rextiles, Thu Jul 4 04:47:47 2013
• Nice! - RG, Wed Jul 3 12:44:53 2013
• RE: Nice! - DMong, Wed Jul 3 14:54:55 2013
• agreed... - geckoejon, Wed Jul 3 16:52:23 2013
• On the usage of "Ignorance"... - Rextiles, Thu Jul 4 13:55:32 2013
• the definition of insanity... - geckoejon, Fri Jul 5 05:19:05 2013
• RE: the definition of insanity... - caracal, Fri Jul 5 06:10:32 2013
• RE: the definition of insanity... - Rextiles, Fri Jul 5 16:11:32 2013
• RE: the definition of insanity... - geckoejon, Fri Jul 5 19:33:53 2013
• RE: the definition of insanity... - Rextiles, Fri Jul 5 23:22:52 2013
• ...usage of "Ignorance SQUARED"... - RG, Fri Jul 5 12:28:34 2013
• RE: ...usage of "Ignorance SQUARED"... - DISCERN, Fri Jul 5 19:54:36 2013
• RE: ...usage of "Ignorance SQUARED"... - DMong, Sat Jul 6 04:14:04 2013
• RE: ...usage of "Ignorance SQUARED"... - geckoejon, Sat Jul 6 11:11:39 2013
• RE: ...usage of "Ignorance SQUARED"... - RG, Sat Jul 6 15:20:55 2013
• Another 2 cents..... - caracal, Sat Jul 6 21:19:34 2013
• RE: Big Heads - RG, Fri Jul 5 12:46:35 2013
• RE: Big Heads - FR, Wed Jul 17 13:14:23 2013