Since the things are going so well in post-war Iraq Donald Rumsfeld (who was in charge to order the things in Iraq after the war) was depraved from his duty by George Dabbljuh.



Now Condoleeza Rice has been assigned to clear the mess.



According to corresponding reports of different TV stations Donald Rumsfeld learned from this out of the newspaper.



I ask myself if the things are going so well in post-war Iraq (80% blah blah blah and the enthusiasm of the civilians for the U.S. troops) why Donald has been sacked?!?



On top of that he had to learn of this out of the newspapers. What a disgrace!



But surely the reports of killed U.S. soldiers (almost one every day, sometimes two), attacks on the UN or Iraqis who cooperate and demonstrations against the occupiers are just forged by the medias (as froggy makes us believe).



So froggy, why had Donald been sacked if all goes so well?



Hope you forgive me my provocative question (you know, nothing personal but I think you need to sing the song of your employer, that's just it).
-----
Beware of Commies and Mutts!

[ Show Entire Thread ]