>>I think this is fair for fish and game to make it a requirement

>> That to own a venomous snake and be realy safe.

>> You must be innoculated and very resistant to the said species.

>> Not just have Antivenom and hope it gets installed correctly.

>> Thats way too risky and expensive to the public hospital and all that.

>>

>> Antivenom is primitive to say the least.

>> and is just another control you have to deal with.

>> I figure I have saved several million dollars!!!! To me

>> thats worth it. and venom is free go figure.

>>

>> The state may agree I am emailing this to fish and game to

>> get the ball rolling.

>> any comments?

>>

>> bud





seriously now man, give your head a shake, do you hear yourself?! how realistically feasible or practical do you think this is? you obviously don't have the full grasp on whats involved and you want to talk risk? There is not a professional institution in the world that would touch this with a ten foot pole (i doubt you could talk even bill haast into it for you either).

i'm sure F&G will find this just as rediculous as i do, and by saying such you probably have actually done more harm to the 'seriousness' of hot keeping than good.

[ Show Entire Thread ]