Posted by:
CKing
at Wed Nov 12 21:08:31 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ]
WW wrote:
"In the case of Eunectes beniensis, there is evidence from a number of characters, recorded as part of the first major revision of the anacondas for 50 or so years, that suggests that it is a distinct anaconda, so personally, I would have no problem accepting it."
WW is apparently employing typology here, since he is recognizing "E. beniensis" as a distinct species on the basis it has a different morphotype.
[ Hide Replies ]
|