![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] |
Posted by: CKing at Sat Nov 15 09:02:00 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ] Your tree is contradicted by Heise et al. (1995). Your hypothesis is based partly on your tree and mostly on chemical similarities. Since chemical similarity has been shown to be unreliable evidence of homology, and since your tree has been contradicted by mtDNA data, your hypothesis is pretty much falsified as far as I am concerned. Ignoring contradictory evidence will not save your theory. Refuting it will. Therefore it is best for you to refute the evidence I present instead of ignoring it. But can you do it? | ||
>> Next Message: blah blah blah - BGF, Sat Nov 15 14:55:18 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: Put your money where your mouth is.. - BGF, Fri Nov 14 22:36:48 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|