I've never compared it to the "string" method. But it seems to work well. I'm sure others have used it in here. Anyone else done a comparison on different methods and figured out which is more accurate?
-----
Chantel a.k.a. sillygirl

"I came, I saw, I adopted"



2.4.0 green anoles (Stumpy (M)), and the rest remain nameless.

2.2.0 green tree frogs (Romeo & Juliet, Bonnie & Clyde)

0.0.3 D. tinctorius (Cobalt froglets)

0.0.1 Anerythristic 'B' (Charcoal)corn snake (Popcorn)

0.0.1 Snow Corn (KandyKorn)

0.2 Amel Corns (KornSilk & KornMuffin)

0.0.1 Giant African Millipede

2.4 Domestic house cats (Bad Boy (m), Bart(m),Sasha(F),Little Bit(F),Spirit(F)

1.0 Rottweiler (Jake)

1.2 Rats (new additions with no names yet)

1.0 Husband (David, who loves all my critters too)

[ Hide Replies ]

• how do you guys measure? - x1purpleXhaze1x, Sun Nov 16 16:44:22 2003
• Do a search of the archives for - Jonah, Sun Nov 16 17:39:14 2003
• RE: how do you guys measure? - griffindor, Sun Nov 16 19:32:41 2003
• Bingo........NP. - Gargoyle420, Mon Nov 17 01:00:58 2003
• String? Is that some kind of software? Too easy and low tech! - Jonah, Mon Nov 17 10:45:11 2003
• String is too hard, this is how I do it. - Sillygirl, Mon Nov 17 17:12:56 2003
• does it work? have you compared the results to a traditional method? - griffindor, Mon Nov 17 21:56:44 2003
• RE: does it work? have you compared the results to a traditional method? - Sillygirl, Tue Nov 18 10:58:09 2003
• RE: does it work? have you compared the results to a traditional method? - x1purpleXhaze1x, Tue Nov 18 16:14:38 2003