Posted by:
rodmalm
at Fri Nov 21 23:41:53 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rodmalm ]
Well, the only thing I have to back that up is that I saw them with my own eyes. (Sorry, no left wing publications to back up what I saw, and I didn't read it anywhere, so I can't give you any references this time.) (I live about 40 miles south of S.F. and drive up there about one to two times a month delivering animals, I saw them when making one of my deliveries.) Truly disgusting to see them defecating and vomiting in the street just to make it tough on the cops-and over 1/2 of them had video cameras and many were filming the whole time. They primarily had their cameras trained on the police that were arresting others in the group.
I did get to tape and view the O'Reilly show you were talking about. Interesting that they viewed a lot of the report with skepticism, but in the end they all said that they believed that there is an Iraq/al Qaeda link because of this memo and other facts they have---even the guy that argued against the memo said that. They also said some of the memo was questionable, not all, but with 50 different connections and multiple sources both domestic and foreign, what would you expect? Just because some parts of the memo aren't above reproach doesn't mean that every part is, or even that the questionable parts are positively wrong. Only one out of 50 has to be right to prove that there is a link.
Rodney
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: more.. - rodmalm, Fri Nov 21 23:41:53 2003