Posted by:
rodmalm
at Sat Nov 22 15:40:20 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rodmalm ]
Joe, Joe, Joe, how do you come up with this stuff?
I state that they needed all the extra security because of Bush's visit and the protesters, and you say, "It's not because of that, it's because of terrorists!" Don't you understand that that is exactly where a terrorist could be, in the crowd of protesters, just like I said. If it was only because of terrorists, and not the protesters, why wouldn't they always have that much security? No one ever knows when a terrorist will strike! It is because of Bush's importance, his presence there, and all the protests that they had to increase security. If there weren't so may protesters because of Bush's visit, security wouldn't have to watch so many potential terrorists in the crowd of protesters. And you say I have no grasp of reality? What are you going to argue next? The meaning of the word is?
I guess the heightened security will stay there long after Bush is no longer there, since it is there only for the terrorists and not due to the protesters. (We all know that the British are as big a target as the Americans are.)
(Once you know how to read, and comprehend what you are reading, logic would be a good thing to learn next!  )
Rodney.
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: World Trade Conference...The Media in action - rodmalm, Sat Nov 22 15:40:20 2003