Posted by:
Menhir
at Tue Dec 2 14:09:54 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Menhir ]
...the explanation you gave is right. I hope that he will simply believe in the things you said.
But, I miss one thing in your explanation in that whole discussion, which I tried to figure out in my post (very far) below.
Since, there seem to be no proven MotleyBloods out there, we do not know, how a MotleyBlood Belly should look like. I wouldn't ever allow me to say, wheter it is a MotleyBlood or not, just by looking at the belly, with the fact that we all do not know, how it should look like!
We know from other morphs like AneryCharcoals that one gene can hide the other, so we have Anery looking animals. Who told you, that a true MotleyBlood can't have a MotleyBelly - god?
Just wanted to say this, because this is, imho, not a correct way to argument in this discussion. So I was speaking of - breed it to the 3 involved Morphs and if you get all homo. hatchlings, it is AmelMotleyBlood. If not, it is not AmelMotleyBlood.
Greetings
P.S.: Perhaps the post would be better in the posts below - but the plot is still understandable...
[ Hide Replies ]
|
Keep in mind... - Menhir, Tue Dec 2 14:09:54 2003