>>...the explanation you gave is right. I hope that he will simply believe in the things you said.

>>

>>But, I miss one thing in your explanation in that whole discussion, which I tried to figure out in my post (very far) below.

>>

>>Since, there seem to be no proven MotleyBloods out there, we do not know, how a MotleyBlood Belly should look like. I wouldn't ever allow me to say, wheter it is a MotleyBlood or not, just by looking at the belly, with the fact that we all do not know, how it should look like!

>>

>>We know from other morphs like AneryCharcoals that one gene can hide the other, so we have Anery looking animals. Who told you, that a true MotleyBlood can't have a MotleyBelly - god?

>>

>>Just wanted to say this, because this is, imho, not a correct way to argument in this discussion. So I was speaking of - breed it to the 3 involved Morphs and if you get all homo. hatchlings, it is AmelMotleyBlood. If not, it is not AmelMotleyBlood.

>>

>>Greetings

>>

>>P.S.: Perhaps the post would be better in the posts below - but the plot is still understandable...
-----
Marcel Poots (Holland)

'Where is your crown King Nothing?' James Hettfield

[ Show Entire Thread ]