Posted by:
CKing
at Tue Dec 16 06:50:15 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ]
I understand your affection for rattlesnakes, and of course you are also entitled to your belief that they are not a nuisance. Other people do not share your affection and they also do not share your belief. For these people, long distance translocation is the only way to ensure their own safety since short distance translocation results in a return of these snakes in many cases. The alternatives to long distance translocation include killing them or leaving them in place. To most people these alternatives just aren't acceptable. To some, either of these may be a perfect solution. That is why there are a number of alternative "solutions" to nuisance rattlers. It is up to the individual facing the problem to decide which solution is best for him/her.
[ Hide Replies ]
- Nuisance rattlesnakes - CKing, Wed Dec 10 09:49:55 2003
- RE: Nuisance rattlesnakes - Tony D, Wed Dec 10 14:56:01 2003
- RE: Nuisance rattlesnakes - greghenry, Wed Dec 10 20:43:35 2003
- Eat Them >>> - chris_mcmartin, Fri Dec 12 20:22:04 2003
- RE: Nuisance rattlesnakes - Wolverton, Sun Dec 14 18:25:06 2003
- RE: Nuisance rattlesnakes - CKing, Sun Dec 14 19:50:08 2003
- Uh, uh. - Wolverton, Sun Dec 14 23:41:59 2003
- RE: Uh, uh. - CKing, Mon Dec 15 21:03:46 2003
- RE: Uh, uh. - greghenry, Mon Dec 15 22:54:19 2003
- RE: Uh, uh. - Wolverton, Tue Dec 16 02:14:04 2003
 RE: Uh, uh. - CKing, Tue Dec 16 06:50:15 2003
|
