Posted by:
Larry D. Fishel
at Mon Dec 29 22:44:09 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Larry D. Fishel ]
>>Not to split hairs, but the retic isn't going to be 2x as fat as it is long.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here? Simple geometry...if you take 3 dimentional object and scale it up to twice it's length, it also becomes twice as wide and twice as high...therefore 2^3 or 8 times the volume/weight of the original...
>>They just aren't a fat snake.
Agreed. Fluffy is quite fat for a retic. However I've seen pictures now from two sources of the alleged monster which look like pics of the same snake, so I don't think they are old file photos...and it is FAT!!!
>>Not to mention the fact that snakes kept as pets eat much better than wild snakes I'm sure.
True, but see above. ----- Larry D. Fishel
Side effects may include paralysis
and death but are generally mild.
[ Hide Replies ]
- World's largest snake caught - jhasty, Mon Dec 29 08:41:31 2003
- RE: World's largest snake caught - jhasty, Mon Dec 29 08:42:41 2003
- RE: amazing!, here's the text from story... - gaus, Mon Dec 29 09:55:31 2003
- RE: World's largest snake caught - Larry D. Fishel, Mon Dec 29 12:57:04 2003
- But now the question is... - JimmyDavid, Mon Dec 29 14:19:14 2003
- Just one more thing - JimmyDavid, Mon Dec 29 14:45:06 2003
- RE: World's largest snake caught - hermitcore, Mon Dec 29 15:32:26 2003
- Here is the picture - Marcel Poots, Mon Dec 29 16:37:33 2003

- RE: World's largest snake caught - frankw, Mon Dec 29 17:12:59 2003
- This is not a very large python...... - MikeWilbanks, Tue Dec 30 09:51:32 2003
|