Posted by:
Tad Fitzgerald
at Wed Apr 14 10:40:02 2004 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Tad Fitzgerald ]
I follow the line of thinking that it may be complicated to define precisely 100% if in fact we are looking at an example of hypomelanism or albinism, but what is the point?
If in fact we are not sure wouldn't it be MORE resposible to continue to use the current nomenclature until we ARE sure?
Honestly, everyone may have their opinions or theorys but we need to look at the current facts regarding this and represent our animals as such.
If you are arguing that in spite of these current facts we are still misrepresenting them, I can't understand that. Maybe that's the part I'm missing? Please explain further and try and use more simple explanations so I can more easily follow along.
Tad
[ Hide Replies ]
|