I first want to make it clear that the PARC guidelines are not a hard set of rules but a framework that can be adapted to state, local, and species-specific circumstances. The PARC guidelines are a guide that enables stakeholders to deal with regulatory issues across the country.



In addition, I do not believe that taking action only when a species becomes imperiled is a defensible position. If we are taking animals, it is reasonable to have some sort of measure to see what is an acceptable level of take to ensure that herpetofaunal populations do not decline. Science-based decisions should drive the management of herpetofauna as it does other faunal groups (deer, elk, and turkeys) to ensure sustainable harvests and populations.



Therefore, PARC seeks solutions that are neither overly restrictive or exclusively T/E focused by initiating dialogue based on regional, statewide, and local concerns.



I believe that all concerned herpetophiles should voice their opinions and describe their reasoning at local PARC meetings and to state and local agency officials. PARC appreciates all viewpoints and attempts to find balanced, pragmatic solutions that benefit hobbyist, regulator, and, last but not least, our native herpetofauna.



Bill thanks for the thread and Fred Bruckman for the comment.



Cheers,

Luke Fedewa

PARC States' Coordinator

[ Hide Replies ]

• PARC Regulatory Guidelines - wildtropics, Wed Apr 21 11:53:29 2004
• RE: PARC Regulatory Guidelines Link and Commentsh - fredbruckman, Thu Apr 22 10:30:19 2004
• RE: PARC Regulatory Guidelines Link and Commentsh - lfedewa, Thu Apr 22 15:31:59 2004
• RE: PARC Regulatory Guidelines Link and Commentsh - Rick Staub, Tue May 25 14:50:19 2004