Posted by:
Rainshadow
at Tue Apr 27 13:41:20 2004 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Rainshadow ]
Then by the definition given by the originator,it's not a "pastel"...the term is a generic,descriptive term that doesn't have a particular,or,specific hereditary,bloodlineal source. it is often used to describe "soft",secondary,or,background coloration seen in B.c.i. AND,B.c.c.,often combined with an ill-defined latteral pattern.by Jeff's own admission,the "pastels" he produces,are the product of multi-lineal combinations,and,subsequent selection,and,reintroduction...this points to selective refinement,and,cumulative result,rather than direct result of specific,genetic trait inheritence,which ALWAYS requires specific bloodline adhesion,to be "proven".
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|
