![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: viper69 at Mon May 3 20:19:20 2004 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by viper69 ] When using an adjective, such as hypomelanistic, that implies to me, and many other people, that a particular snake that's hypomelanistic has some sort of mutation causing it to have less pigment. This mutation does not normally occur in the general population. However, if the known population of a species is very pale to begin with (such as a Hogg), then you can't refer to it as hypomelanistic, because its NATURALLY like that to begin with, w/out any abnormal genetic mutation. Compared to a redtail boa sure, it's hypomelanistic, but conversely, a redtail boa could be called HYPERmelanistic. [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: HYPO SURINAME SORRY FOR THE CONFUSSION - ambulls, Fri Apr 30 13:18:59 2004 << Previous topic: Snow boas? Why do I see so few of them and how much are they? - viper69, Fri Apr 30 01:34:35 2004 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|