Do you ever argue about anything you know about?



Don't you know that scanners can be used to "scan" an image to make it digital? That is the function of a scanner! To get an analog photo digitized so it can be used in a computer! Guess what, digital cameras do basically the same thing!



Can't you figure out that a camera or a scanner could be used for the same purpose?



I don't know what process or equipment they used, and since you weren't there when they made the CD, neither do you, so I gave you a choice in my previous post of what they could have used.



And that once it is digital, it is then easily manipulated, with software?



Haven't you ever seen the ads. on kingsnake that were of unbelievably poor quality when this was done? (regular film photos that were scanned)



(Again, I am sorry for all the bold type fonts! But, as some people have problems comprehending things, and it might help some people to better understand English, I will continue to use them.)





Here's something for you to check out, since you think everything I post is made up,





Col. David Black, who led the regiment in the 1980s, told British Broadcasting Corp. television that equipment and a truck pictured in the photos had not been used by the regiment in Iraq. He said he did not believe the photos had been taken in the Middle Eastern country.



"The evidence we have seen so far looking at the photographs, there are too many inconsistencies," he said.





AND THIS



The rifle appears to be an SA80 mk 1, which was not issued to soldiers in Iraq. Troops wear berets or hard hats, not the floppy hats as seen in the pictures. The truck in the photo also appears to be a type never used in Iraq.



This should be pretty easy to verify, to see, if in fact, the photo's are even possible to have occurred in Iraq. I don't think these arguments would have even been made, if they weren't true, for this reason.







http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0503britain-prisoner-abuse03-ON.html







Rodney

[ Show Entire Thread ]