Posted by:
Jeff Schofield
at Mon May 17 21:54:41 2004 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jeff Schofield ]
While Tony and I have had our differences about "outbreeding"in the past,I think it fair to say that attrition in this "ssp"is due to more obvious things than "inbreeding".Firstly,there has been "only"2-3 generations POSSIBLY inbred--and MOST of the first breeders only bred homoXhet so that only 3/4 of the genes COULD have been passed along.I think the problems with this "ssp"in the past has been inexperienced keepers,VERY delicate babies,and parasitation due to compromising feeding regimes.This morph has been around since about 1990 and there STILL arent that many around because they simply CANT be mass produced like other snakes so that even the "EXPERTS"who can afford them lose them consistently enough to develop a following.Those who HAVE bred them are also keeping the price high enough to avoid continued attrition,in this case a GOOD thing.
With the "degree"of outcrossing Tony chosen(with NJ&NC X MD blood)any LOCALE breeders should be well aware of each founding animals'differing lines.I say this only because this "ssp"was known as BOTH "temporalis"AND "Diodata",so in many circles this outcrossing is either a man made "cross"OR a "intergrade" depending upon whose definition you subscribe to.Tony,no offense here buddy,lol,this one isnt about you at all.Simply NOT enough temp people around anymore to harass.Jeff
[ Hide Replies ]
|