Posted by:
Sojourner
at Sat Jul 10 10:50:50 2004 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Sojourner ]
The terminology of DH Sunglow and DH Ghost is accurate. Het being short for heterozygous, which a hypo has to at least be, to be a hypo. My break from convention is in the thought that the hypo gene acts co-dominantly. I assure you that it was not my intention to dumb down anything, or shoot it over the heads of the masses either.
We can all benefit from these sort of discussions if they are kept civil. Thank you for your thoughts.
Jesse Van Atta
Forever Boas
-----
"Continuing to cling to the patterns you know, inhibits your ability to discover what you don't know." - Eric Allenbaugh
[ Hide Replies ]
- BREAKING THE PARADIGM ON HYPOS, CO-DOMINANCE, AND DOMINANCE....... - Sojourner, Fri Jul 9 19:31:46 2004
- I would be very interested in your thoughts on the anerythristic gene. - azreptiles, Fri Jul 9 19:40:57 2004
- Lay it on us - obz, Fri Jul 9 19:42:12 2004
- Thanks for validating my point... - Razor, Fri Jul 9 19:45:18 2004
- Very well put, Sojourner..... - Biophiliacs, Fri Jul 9 20:08:19 2004
- Incomplete at best..... - Sojourner, Fri Jul 9 20:37:50 2004
- Genetics in a whole... - srsnakes, Fri Jul 9 20:50:46 2004
- RE: BREAKING THE PARADIGM ON HYPOS, CO-DOMINANCE, AND DOMINANCE....... - ajfreptiles, Fri Jul 9 21:14:35 2004
- RE: BREAKING THE PARADIGM ON HYPOS, CO-DOMINANCE, AND DOMINANCE....... - treeboas.com, Sat Jul 10 10:01:32 2004
|
My opinion on the conventions of double hets...... - Sojourner, Sat Jul 10 10:50:50 2004