![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Rat Snakes ] |
Posted by: terryp at Wed May 14 23:03:01 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by terryp ] and helping me out. I've heard Burbrink's paper isn't going through acceptance very well right now. Isn't there a follow up paper to the "A Reevaluation of Populations of the Corn Snake . . ." by Vagahan, Dixon and Thomas. Their 1996 paper is the accepted definition currently isn't it? | ||
>> Next Message: No problemo.... - Terry Cox, Thu May 15 05:07:48 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: I think the black rat sn ake is going . . .> - Terry Cox, Wed May 14 20:03:22 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|