I remember that gecko as a baby. It's actually a tiger, but it's so dark now, that it makes the tiger pattern difficult to distinguish. It's definitely a different looking tiger, though. Something I'd try to breed some red into.

That one isn't related to the marble line I'm working with. The original female marble was only a subadult when that particular gecko hatched.

On a marble, the orange and dark patterns are wide and zig zag accross the dorsum and down onto the sides. Also, when they're colored up, the dark pattern on the marble will be very feint (as shown in the photo).

-Anthony

>>Except for the white spots on his side, he looks like what Anthony described as "marble", albeit muted. Anthony?
>>-----
>>Terri
>>4:8:7 crested geckos: Popcorn, Goldfish, Harley, Bear, Big Red, Olive, Smudge, Blackie, Belle, Brilliant, Tina, Brick, Toni(y), Kermit, ChiliPepper, Spot, WildFire, WildSpatter & Randy(i)

-----
----------------------------------
Anthony Caponetto
www.ACreptiles.com

[ Hide Replies ]

• What morph would you consider this pair? - JeffG, Mon Dec 27 18:12:02 2004
• RE: What morph would you consider this pair? - flamedcrestie, Mon Dec 27 18:47:02 2004
• prototype marble? - lzrdldy530, Tue Dec 28 12:42:32 2004
• RE: prototype marble? - AnthonyCaponetto, Tue Dec 28 21:56:05 2004
• RE: What morph would you consider this pair? - gecco, Wed Dec 29 09:46:58 2004
• RE: What morph would you consider this pair? - flamedcrestie, Wed Dec 29 12:02:25 2004