What I want to know is when can we start having trappers to "cull" the over population of people? To me, 1000 foxes in one area isn't too many. If there are 1000 foxes not clever enough to stay away from a trap, then obviously that habitat is plentiful enough to support that many. It's just the people that are inconvenienced and feel the pressure. If it's too many, then they will eventually die off and the numbers will decline naturally. We should all be so lucky to live in an area that would support that many animals of just ONE species. Sounds like pristine habitat, suitable for many animals and one that, IMO, people should stay out of b/c that's the only animal that can OVER populate it's own environment and manage to stay alive.

I don't agree that peoples rights should be limited in any way and I'd be pretty pissed if a group tried to limit my freedoms like they have in NY. But using your examples probably aren't the best way to get a group of people who obviously are fascinated by wildlife (so much so that we want to have it in our homes) to see your side of things.

Obviously just MY thoughts and they are thoughts that will be deleted shortly I'm sure b/c this thread is controversial and lord knows we can't have that here...

jb
-----
Jonathan Brady

"Sarcasm is angers ugly cousin" -Dr. Buddy Rydell (Jack Nicholson) in "Anger Management".

[ Show Entire Thread ]