Posted by:
Paul Hollander
at Mon Feb 28 10:53:46 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Paul Hollander ]
>OK, we have 100% hets, 66% hets, and 50% hets. Is it really reasonable to have any additional possible het numbers/percentages? Too me, anything below a 50% het, from a reputable breeder, is just a normal.
Once I proved out a heterozygous pied ringneck dove three generations down from the nearest heterozygous pied. But it was sheer chance. IMHO, pricing for the offspring of a 50% probability het x normal mating should be the same as for normals.
100% het = het. Stamp out and eliminate redundancy. 
Paul Hollander
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|