![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Boa Forum ] |
Posted by: boidmorphs at Mon Feb 28 12:45:27 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by boidmorphs ] I agree the term 100% het is redundant but I actually prefer it so there is no question and emphasize the fact that a given animal is a definite het and not XX% possible. When paying top dollar I myself kind of like the reassurance. If down the road an animal does not prove out the seller can't say they sold it as a possible het because that 100% before the word het eliminates any "possible" confusion lol. IMHO leaving it out can do more harm than good. | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Genetics question/what do you think? - Paul Hollander, Mon Feb 28 10:53:46 2005 | ||
|
|
|
|