![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Rat Snakes ] |
Posted by: jtibbett at Sun Mar 20 12:51:16 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by jtibbett ] I always wondered what the criteria were for claiming that something was a subspecies rather than a separate species. For example, what exactly is it that makes o. quadrivatta (is it quadrivattUS now? I'm assuming it is, but correct me if I'm wrong) a subspecies of o. obsoletus? Why couldn't it be quadrivattus quadrivattus? Is it that o. obsoletus has the larger range, or are there DNA tests or something? [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Emory breeding outcomes? - phflame, Sat Mar 19 21:56:55 2005 << Previous topic: Have you guys seen the calico and lemon "cow suckers" on Will Bird's site? - DeanAlessandrini, Fri Mar 18 16:01:49 2005 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|