Posted by:
McCloskey
at Thu Apr 21 23:38:50 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by McCloskey ]
First of all, it's obvious that you aren't a day older than fifteen. If you really are older than fifteen, I wouldn't be proud of that because your posts are really immature.
Second, did you even read the previous post? For that matter, did you read your own reply to my post? If you know all the risks of keeping snakes together, then why even bring it up? With that many risks - risks I'm assuming you know about - how could you think there would be some as yet undiscovered benefit to keeping them together?
That much aside, if you did the research you claimed to have done, you'd have seen that aside from possible cannibalism it doesn't make any difference what size the animals are. It doesn't matter what species they are. It doesn't matter if they're from the same #$^%ing clutch - it just doesn't make any difference. You'd have known that. Every board on this site fields this question twice monthy, and every board on this site has it's irritated regulars who are sick of answering this question. There's no good reason for it. They are solitary animals. The only benefit from keeping them together is for the keeper, who gets to save some money, and have more space. You're just angry with me for pointing out your hypocrisy.
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|