Posted by:
Rainshadow
at Fri Jun 10 16:17:20 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Rainshadow ]
These animals have consistantly defied the "rules" as I have always felt I understood them as well. I certainly don't claim to know exactly which ones are heterozygous,and,which aren't,(or,homozygous for that matter.) Anyone that has become familiar with me through my posts here on the Forum,(or,other boards.)should know that I'm really just continually searching for the right answers to my own questions,if I were motivated solely by making a buck,or,blowing a bunch of smoke up anyones rear end,I would've just jumped on the Jungle bandwagon,and,sold all but one,or,two of the animals I've produced from the original group at exorbitant prices...I can tell you it would've certainly been much less work,and,a lot more financially rewarding.I doubt that very many people would've ever complained in terms of their appearence...two primary characteristics associated with this bloodline are directly inherited in a non-recessive manner,pattern aberrancies & coloration/pigmentation...I can honestly say that I have seen enough proof though my breeding results,that I do not need anymore convincing,so very few of my future breeding plans will be geared toward trying to provide evidence to convince others...I'm simply moving forward in the direction I think will provide the best results over the long term...my advice to those that already own animals from this line,no matter what they look like,would be; "breed them" and,see for yourself...I seriously doubt that we have seen the best of what this line can offer & I'm more interested in looking for it first & trying to explain it later! *lol*...We've been blessed with two more "never before seen" examples of seemingly spontaneous mutation from them this year,and,it opens a host of brand new questions that I'm sure will require even more attention,so we've got plenty to keep us occupied for a while...
[ Hide Replies ]
|
So far... - Rainshadow, Fri Jun 10 16:17:20 2005