Right now I've proved the Fuego's dom, I suspect there will be a super, we'll see. I've produced Fuegos in two clutches, by two seperate females this year.



I'm saying the Anery is imcomplete dom (what people call co-dom), based on the offspring she produced for me, including a Fuego cross this year.



Not what on earth is wrong with anything I've stated?



>>Well, the fires are visable het for Lucys. Im just saying you cant say that they are visible hets unless you have something other then them to show for it. If you breed 2 of them together and get a super, or a lucy if they are flames or fires, then thats awesome... and congrats. But you cant say that they are co-dom untill genetics and time prove other wise. I have been working with balls for years, and i have had many females make weird looking offspring for more then one year in a row but i cant say its genetic, b/c i havent proved anything. The reason why people praise the fires is b/c of what it produces. And yes i know very well that politics in the ball trade, well suck. But thats just the way that it works i guess, and sometimes it is unfortunate. But anyway i wish you the best of luck. Hopefully next year you can prove out a super and prove me worng.
-----
Justyn Miller

Intense Herpetoculture

www.IntenseHerp.com (Proudly hosted by Fauna Net)

[ Show Entire Thread ]