And I see that the poster has in fact a PIT BULL ! See my comparison of the 2. I really think this poster is not that serious about the keeping of a hot but I don't know for sure. I said it above and one more time...........I see no difference in the un-responsible hot or any animal keeper if they are un-responsible and laws are passed as they are passed but a lot of times on the thinking of what could happen, will happen without it even happening. Do I make sense here ? AND basically the ultimate thinking ( if I'm not wrong here ) is if this person gets nabbed by his wanting to keep a hot and does get tagged or something else happens, and by his post, possibly more laws comes down ? If you want to argue about the " inherently dangerous aspects " of the 2, I would say that the PIT BULL would be more to worry about on a un-responsible keeper than his keeping of a hot ! Not saying that the original poster is un-responsible keeper of that Pit Bull but statistics show.....NOPE! Don't want a debate on the Pit Bull or other breed inherently dangerous dog breeds syndrome. Again my .02 cents worth ?
-----
I may be old , cantankerous, crabby, and cynical, but......

[ Show Entire Thread ]