Now you're arguing just for the sake of saving face. I'm bored, I'll play. Plus it'll be a good lesson in logic.



No, you didn't profess that your statement was specific (which, in context doesn't quite make sense). As luck would have it, I wasn't directly responding to anything you said. I was responding to this statement by the original poster:



"venomous snakes move, think, act, etc different than non."



The implication here is that anything that can be classified as a venomous snake moves AND thinks AND acts differently from anything that can be classified as a non-venomous snake. This statement is rendered false by a single venomous snake that either moves, acts, or thinks the same as a non-venomous. Can you think of one? I can. It's therefore false (incorrect, lol).



That said, you could potentially dispute the definition of "same" but just drop it, and lets all be friends.



If you want to "refine" or ellaborate on the statement you originally made to the point that it's correct and less easily "misinterrpreted" that's perfectly fine with me, lol.



JJ

[ Show Entire Thread ]