Kingsnake.com

Posted by: shawn lockhart at Wed Oct 12 15:47:32 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by shawn lockhart ]

Geneticall speaking, there is no such thing as a 25% het or a 33% het.

When a 50% het or a 66% het is crossed with a normal, the chances of producing a het are either 50%, if the 50% or 66% is later proven to be 100% het, or the chance is 0% if the possible het turned out to be just a normal.

[ Hide Replies ]

% 0n hets ???? - leehafley, Wed Oct 12 15:16:57 2005

RE: % 0n hets ???? - tns4life, Wed Oct 12 15:19:39 2005

RE: % 0n hets ???? - shawn lockhart, Wed Oct 12 15:47:32 2005

Correction.... - LadyOhh, Wed Oct 12 16:24:26 2005

RE: Correction.... - Oz, Wed Oct 12 17:14:09 2005

explain... - herphobbyist, Wed Oct 12 17:51:23 2005

Correct.... more... - Oz, Wed Oct 12 20:50:05 2005

I think what he ment was ... - toshamc, Wed Oct 12 19:10:35 2005

exactly Tosha.. - herphobbyist, Wed Oct 12 22:39:53 2005

Now that we are all clear... - LadyOhh, Wed Oct 12 23:08:08 2005

not quite - cmlreptiles, Thu Oct 13 08:37:38 2005

what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - Oz, Thu Oct 13 10:21:10 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 11:59:44 2005

anthony - herphobbyist, Thu Oct 13 12:41:18 2005

RE: anthony - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 13:16:17 2005

RE: anthony - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 13:31:55 2005

the real awnser - reptilelab, Thu Oct 13 16:00:02 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 13:59:01 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 14:14:54 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 14:22:34 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 15:15:50 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 15:24:09 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - cmlreptiles, Fri Oct 14 09:33:03 2005

RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - cmlreptiles, Thu Oct 13 18:24:53 2005

RE: Correction.... - Paul Hollander, Thu Oct 13 13:59:53 2005

RE: Correction.... - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 14:16:46 2005

RE: This is the view that I brought up last year. - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 13:36:41 2005

good point Chris... - herphobbyist, Thu Oct 13 13:42:02 2005

25% Chance Hets - RandyRemington, Fri Oct 14 07:10:32 2005

RE: % 0n hets ???? - leehafley, Thu Oct 13 14:12:16 2005

STOP THE MADDNESS! - asfreptiles, Fri Oct 14 00:30:44 2005

slight correction - cmlreptiles, Fri Oct 14 09:37:58 2005

>> Next topic: Tucson, Arizona - ncary, Wed Oct 12 15:32:53 2005
<< Previous topic: One of my new additions - NorthernRegius, Wed Oct 12 14:30:53 2005

Enjoy all our content free of charge with a user account that gives you full access to every feature. For added visibility, paid options are available - post in our Classifieds, showcase your business with Banner Ads or a Directory listing, promote reptile events, and more.

RE: % 0n hets ????

KINGSNAKE.COM

Quick Links

Community

Legal & Safety

Support