There is one inherent problem with comparing genetics to statistics-- snake genetics are variable through breeding experiments.



The mathematical formula ".50 x .50 = .25" is not a correct representation of the genetics involved.



In the formula above, the ".50" is constant. In genetics, the ".50" is variable. In this case, the same formula would read: "A x .50 = .25" (Let A represent the possibility of the Albino gene in the parent.) Obviously this formula is flawed in that it does not allow for the parent animal to be EITHER Heterozygous or Normal.



If the parent animal is proven Normal, the formula would then read:

"0 x .50 = .25" This is obviously incorrect.



If the parent animal is proven Heterozygous, the formula would then read:

"1.0 x .50 = .25" This is also incorrect.



Although I personally subscribe to the 25%er labeling system, it is a flawed system.





Chris
-----
mean people suck

[ Show Entire Thread ]