Actually, in a 100% x 100% each offspring has a 25% chance of being normal, 50% chance of being het, and a 25% chance of being homoz. Not the clutch will produce 25%, 50%, 25%. It's why you can get 4 albinos 1 yr from a het x het, and 0 the next several years. So all the normal looking babies have a 66% chance of being het for the gene. Not 66% OF them.



Chris
-----
1.1.0 Irian x Jungle Carpet Pythons

1.2.0 Black Rats- Robert, Cady, Kylie

1.2.0 Albino FL Kings-Nick, Jessica, Ashley

1.1.0 Crimson Corns-Kane, Ruby

0.1.0 Het-Crimson Corns-Lola

0.1.0 White-Sided/Pos Het Albino Black Rat-Lita

1.0.0 Albino White-sided Black Rat-Rey

0.1.0 Albino/Het White-sided Black Rat-Stacey

1.2.0 Creamsicle Corns-Vince, Trish, Torrie

0.1.0 Fl King-Bonnie

1.0.1 Green Tree Pythons Biak-Brandon, Aru-Orochimaru

1.0.0 Flame X Blood Bearded-Ruff

2.4.0 Ball Pythons-Kritsy, Gretchen, Alexis, 100% het for albino balls- Naruto, Hinata, 66% het VPI Axanthic-Sasuke

0.1.0 Red-tail Boa-Xena

0.0.1 Savannah Monitor-Izzy

[ Hide Replies ]

• % 0n hets ???? - leehafley, Wed Oct 12 15:16:57 2005
• RE: % 0n hets ???? - tns4life, Wed Oct 12 15:19:39 2005
• RE: % 0n hets ???? - shawn lockhart, Wed Oct 12 15:47:32 2005
• Correction.... - LadyOhh, Wed Oct 12 16:24:26 2005
• RE: Correction.... - Oz, Wed Oct 12 17:14:09 2005
• explain... - herphobbyist, Wed Oct 12 17:51:23 2005
• Correct.... more... - Oz, Wed Oct 12 20:50:05 2005
• I think what he ment was ... - toshamc, Wed Oct 12 19:10:35 2005
• exactly Tosha.. - herphobbyist, Wed Oct 12 22:39:53 2005
• Now that we are all clear... - LadyOhh, Wed Oct 12 23:08:08 2005
• not quite - cmlreptiles, Thu Oct 13 08:37:38 2005
• what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - Oz, Thu Oct 13 10:21:10 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 11:59:44 2005
• anthony - herphobbyist, Thu Oct 13 12:41:18 2005
• RE: anthony - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 13:16:17 2005
• RE: anthony - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 13:31:55 2005
• the real awnser - reptilelab, Thu Oct 13 16:00:02 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 13:59:01 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 14:14:54 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 14:22:34 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - anthony james mc, Thu Oct 13 15:15:50 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 15:24:09 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - cmlreptiles, Fri Oct 14 09:33:03 2005
• RE: what???? we are talking probability... it's the most accurate way of - cmlreptiles, Thu Oct 13 18:24:53 2005
• RE: Correction.... - Paul Hollander, Thu Oct 13 13:59:53 2005
• RE: Correction.... - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 14:16:46 2005
• RE: This is the view that I brought up last year. - CJBianco, Thu Oct 13 13:36:41 2005
• good point Chris... - herphobbyist, Thu Oct 13 13:42:02 2005
• 25% Chance Hets - RandyRemington, Fri Oct 14 07:10:32 2005
• RE: % 0n hets ???? - leehafley, Thu Oct 13 14:12:16 2005
• STOP THE MADDNESS! - asfreptiles, Fri Oct 14 00:30:44 2005
• slight correction - cmlreptiles, Fri Oct 14 09:37:58 2005