WW:

Sorry for the sin of not recognizing that the author could have been female. Regardless, the individual has a far greater understanding than myself with respect to molecular details and interpretations.



In the future, I might wish to reference one of those critiques but believe it best I have permission. Consequently, I sent an email message to RS Newton (through the forum mechanism) but have yet to received a reply.



My computer skills are weak so thanks for searching authors indexes. With the understanding the individual has displayed and yet not finding citations for a RS Newton, you may be correct in suggesting that he/she may be using a pseudonym for posting on the Kingsnake forum.



Thanks WW for your input. Richard F. Hoyer

[ Hide Replies ]

• R.S. Newton critiques - RichardFHoyer, Tue Jul 22 13:50:12 2003
• RE: R.S. Newton critiques - wulf, Tue Jul 22 23:45:03 2003
• RE: R.S. Newton critiques - RichardFHoyer, Wed Jul 23 11:15:03 2003
• RE: R.S. Newton critiques - WW, Wed Jul 23 10:03:16 2003
• RE: R.S. Newton critiques - RichardFHoyer, Wed Jul 23 11:40:38 2003
• I got a slightly different impression from the posts.... - chrish, Thu Jul 24 10:23:14 2003
• RE: I got a slightly different impression from the posts.... - RichardFHoyer, Thu Jul 24 14:19:50 2003
• RE: I got a slightly different impression from the posts.... - RSNewton, Fri Aug 1 23:53:23 2003
• RE: I got a slightly different impression from the posts.... - RSNewton, Sat Aug 2 00:43:22 2003