Using phrases like “gross abuse of power”, and requesting that a Chicago alderman send the letter writer (a California resident) detailed statistics on every animal mentioned in the ordinance may make the writer feel good and score points with like-minded folks. But, let’s face it, this is not the best way to convince an elected official to reconsider his or her position. Whether we like it or not, we have to persuade our legislators. So please just stick to some well-chosen facts to make your case.



Also, you, Jason, might want to consider whether you should be ending every email on this issue which you are posting on various internet sites with:



Heads I win tails you lose. Get out of my way I am coming through. Roll the dice and dont think twice when we crush....crush....crush em...crush em! Megadeth



Is this really the impression you wish to leave?



Sorry if I come across as a humorless scold, but the best way to rally support from the widest possible audience often involves submerging parts of our personalities so others aren’t distracted from our main message.

[ Hide Replies ]

• This post contains the proposed Chicago ordinance which bans ownership of many animals>>> - jfmoore, Thu Jul 24 18:54:08 2003
• RE: This post contains the proposed Chicago ordinance which bans ownership of many animals>>> - klorentz, Thu Jul 24 20:56:34 2003
• Here is one of the best letters I have seen yet! - thecaiman, Sat Jul 26 09:37:07 2003
• On lobbying our elected officials versus "preaching to the choir" - jfmoore, Tue Jul 29 16:07:17 2003
• RE: On lobbying our elected officials versus "preaching to the choir" - wildtropics, Tue Jul 29 20:38:20 2003