1. Someone reccomends jungle over sharp

2. You say the only reason he says so is because he only works with Kahl.

You really dont see the parrallel of your assumption? There are various reasons he could have reccomended the jungle but you chose to assume it was only because of his own money driven greed as a pose to actual non-biased advice (based on those various other reasons). I'm not assuming anything, just calling it as it is.

[ Show Entire Thread ]