Home > General Topics S-Z > Taxonomy Discussion
Page: 1 2 3
- Candoia species
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- Calabaria, Eryx & Gongylophis
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- WW, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- reptileheaven, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- wulf, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- rayhoser, Nov 23, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- wulf, Nov 24, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- WW, Nov 24, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- CKing, Nov 25, 2003
- Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- meretseger, Nov 25, 2003
- RE: Does a published paper make it 'technically' right? more...
- CKing, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- reptileheaven, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Be sure to let us poor shlubs..
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- Biochemical homoplasy and the evolution of venom
- CKing, Nov 25, 2003
- Gecko Publications
- reptileaaron, Nov 26, 2003
- Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- CKing, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 26, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- WW, Nov 27, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- meretseger, Nov 27, 2003
- RE: Hey! Science types! Dumb question!
- CKing, Nov 27, 2003
- name changes for my group site on candoia
- sigbboy, Nov 29, 2003
- Helpful, and not so helpful people!
- reptileheaven, Dec 1, 2003
- band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- WW, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: band count?
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- smokeysshadow, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- scott Eipper, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: band count?
- WW, Dec 4, 2003
- Fair point n/p
- scott eipper, Dec 4, 2003
- What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- bengkulu, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- reptileheaven, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- bengkulu, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- CKing, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: What is the current status of Kisatchie corns?
- paalexan, Dec 2, 2003
- RE: "Pantherophis" is a contrived genus, one of many contrived genera
- CKing, Dec 2, 2003
- Thank god you're in the minority.
- paalexan, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: Thank god you're in the minority.
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- paalexan, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- botany103, Dec 19, 2003
- RE: `Good scientists' and `good philosophers'
- WW, Dec 20, 2003
- RE: From polyphyletic to paraphyletic to "non-monophyletic"
- CKing, Dec 21, 2003
- Contrived taxa and why the Hennigians or cladists have to recognize them
- CKing, Dec 3, 2003
- Cytochrome b and the use for phylogenetic analysis?
- wulf, Dec 4, 2003
- Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 4, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 11, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 12, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 12, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Dec 13, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- RichardFHoyer, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Dec 29, 2003
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Replacing Paraphyletic Taxa with Contrived Taxa Scientific Progress?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- Morelia Discription...
- Tormato, Dec 13, 2003
- Budding vs. Splitting
- CKing, Dec 13, 2003
- Agreements and disagreements with WW's criticism of Hoser
- CKing, Dec 14, 2003
- RE: Ignoring taxonomic proposals made in "amateur" publications
- CKing, Dec 14, 2003
- Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- rayhoser, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 16, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- paalexan, Dec 17, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 17, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- WW, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- wulf, Dec 18, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Dec 19, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- ScottThomson, Dec 29, 2003
- RE: Evidence supports taxonomic changes
- CKing, Jan 11, 2004
- Taxonomic Changes "Made Behind the Scenes"
- CKing, Dec 21, 2003
- Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Dec 31, 2003
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- CKing, Jan 1, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- richardwells, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- rayhoser, Jan 2, 2004
- RE: Is Acanthophis lancasteri a valid taxa? and/or is the name available?
- ScottThomson, Jan 2, 2004
- wanted...
- wulf, Jan 2, 2004
- Wells & Wellington papers (Snake sections) available online
- WW, Jan 9, 2004
- Thanks Richard, Carl and Wolfgang. Gladly appreciated...
- Wulf, Jan 9, 2004
- RE: Wells & Wellington papers (Snake sections) available online
- CKing, Jan 10, 2004
- They don't work for me...
- steno, Jan 10, 2004
- RE: They don't work for me...
- WW, Jan 11, 2004
- Thank you Wulf...NP
- steno, Jan 11, 2004
- steno, don't thank me! It's Wolfgang /np
- wulf, Jan 11, 2004
- Ooops! ...sorry Wolfgang thank you /np
- steno, Jan 11, 2004
- Looking for some info/help.........>
- chas*e, Jan 10, 2004
- longissima classification
- nechushtan, Jan 12, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- meretseger, Jan 13, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- WW, Jan 13, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- nechushtan, Jan 13, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- nechushtan, Jan 13, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- WW, Jan 13, 2004
- Ron: As far as ratsnakes in Israel...
- jfirneno, Jan 14, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- CKing, Jan 15, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- Terry Cox, Jan 22, 2004
- Sacred Serpents
- johnscanlon, Mar 3, 2004
- RE: longissima classification
- Snakefinger, Oct 29, 2005
- Chondropython VS. Morelia - a Q.
- steno, Jan 12, 2004
- RE: Chondropython VS. Morelia - a Q.
- wulf, Jan 12, 2004
- Yes Wulf you are completely right...but...
- steno, Jan 12, 2004
- RE: Yes Wulf you are completely right...but...
- wulf, Jan 12, 2004
- Great post Wulf, thanks to enlight me! N/P
- steno, Jan 12, 2004
- Chonropython/Morelia
- rayhoser, Jan 13, 2004
- RE: Chonropython/Morelia
- wulf, Jan 13, 2004
- Australiasian Python taxonomy and - Evidence for those who read or look.
- rayhoser, Jan 14, 2004
- RE: Lumping vs. splitting
- CKing, Jan 15, 2004
- Not really taxinomical but seems like the right crowd to ask
- CamHanna, Jan 19, 2004
- Dendrogram
- jwalters, Jan 26, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- CKing, Jan 27, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- jwalters, Jan 27, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- CKing, Jan 27, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram --Wonderful!
- jwalters, Jan 27, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- jfirneno, Jan 27, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- dhl, Jan 29, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- WW, Jan 29, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- jfirneno, Jan 29, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- WW, Jan 29, 2004
- Some of the trees....
- WW, Jan 29, 2004
- RE: Dendrogram
- CKing, Jan 29, 2004
- Wolfgang, thanks for the info. I'll check out the links (NT)
- jfirneno, Jan 29, 2004
- C. King, it will take me quite a while to familiarize myself with...
- jfirneno, Jan 30, 2004
- "Boa trivirgata?"
- CKing, Feb 1, 2004
- Need Translations of Scientific Names For. . . (Oz Herps) >>>
- chris_mcmartin, Jan 28, 2004
- RE: Need Translations of Scientific Names For. . . (Oz Herps) >>>
- Scott Eipper, Jan 31, 2004
- RE: Need Translations of Scientific Names For. . . (Oz Herps) >>>
- chris_mcmartin, Jan 31, 2004
- Oh yeah >>>
- chris_mcmartin, Jan 31, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- oxyuranus, Jan 31, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- oxyuranus, Jan 31, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- Scott Eipper, Feb 1, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- ScottThomson, Feb 1, 2004
- Better Pics? >>
- chris_mcmartin, Feb 1, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- chris_mcmartin, Feb 1, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- Scott Eipper, Feb 1, 2004
- RE: Oh yeah >>>
- ScottThomson, Feb 8, 2004
- RE: Varanus panoptes
- tworavens, Feb 9, 2004
- RE: Lampropholis
- tworavens, Feb 9, 2004
- Banded snake ID
- johnscanlon, Mar 3, 2004
- RE: Need Translations of Scientific Names For. . . (Oz Herps) >>>
- reptileGOD, Mar 9, 2005
- Lepord geckos
- sanke3b, Feb 1, 2004
- mexican black spineytailed iguana
- clee4560, Feb 3, 2004
- looking for a article on Candoia from a Herpetological Journal from Japan. Anyone?
- sigbboy, Feb 5, 2004
- Batrachoseps stebbinsi Question
- Fieldnotes, Feb 5, 2004
- Charina genera split
- chas*e, Feb 14, 2004
- What does nov. stand for?
- Roadkill, Feb 17, 2004
- Genus Python
- ocherp, Feb 19, 2004
- Common Ringneck food
- HerpHelmz, Feb 29, 2004
- Python reticulatus
- Rdean1, Mar 1, 2004
- Black Ratsnakes vs. Central Ratsnakes
- stewart_stick, Mar 2, 2004
- When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- johnscanlon, Mar 2, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- ScottThomson, Mar 2, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- CKing, Mar 4, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- johnscanlon, Mar 4, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- CKing, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- johnscanlon, Mar 8, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- CKing, Mar 10, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- WW, Mar 11, 2004
- RE: When, if ever, are paraphyletic taxa useful?
- CKing, Mar 11, 2004
- Pailsus pailsi - calling John Scanlon...
- rayhoser, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: 'Pailsus' pailsi ...
- johnscanlon, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: Pailsus pailsi - calling John Scanlon...
- WW, Mar 6, 2004
- Is this ....
- rayhoser, Mar 6, 2004
- Now wouldn't you like to know...
- WW, Mar 6, 2004
- WW - Data wanted, not insults
- rayhoser, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: mtDNA data
- CKing, Mar 6, 2004
- Musical Death Adder Taxa ... WW's latest paper leaked.
- rayhoser, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: Musical Death Adder Taxa ... WW's latest paper leaked.
- Sundberg, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: Musical Death Adder Taxa ... WW's latest paper leaked.
- WW, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: Musical Death Adder Taxa ... WW's latest paper leaked.
- CKing, Mar 5, 2004
- DNA Data ... mmm?
- rayhoser, Mar 5, 2004
- RE: DNA Data ... mmm?
- WW, Mar 6, 2004
- Relevant "experts" - my guess
- rayhoser, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: Relevant "experts" - my guess
- WW, Mar 6, 2004
- Data wanted, not insults
- rayhoser, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: Relevant "experts" - my guess
- CKing, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: Data wanted, not insults
- wulf, Mar 6, 2004
- RE: Data wanted, not insults
- BGF, Mar 7, 2004
- RE: Dogma
- CKing, Mar 7, 2004
- you've got it backwards
- troy h, Apr 12, 2004
- RE: cladistic dogma
- CKing, Apr 16, 2004
- Pheneticism
- CKing, Mar 5, 2004
- trimeresurus
- moadog, Mar 30, 2004
- Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- CKing, Mar 31, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- dhl, Mar 31, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- CKing, Apr 2, 2004
- Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 2, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 2, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 3, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 3, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 4, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 4, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 6, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 6, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- shawn lockhart, Apr 6, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 6, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 6, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 8, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 8, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 8, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- paalexan, Apr 9, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- dhl, Apr 9, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- CKing, Apr 9, 2004
- Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of freeing himself from the Hennigian straightjacket
- CKing, Apr 9, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- paalexan, Apr 9, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- CKing, Apr 9, 2004
- RE: Hyla ('Pseudacris') regilla - a potential can of taxonomic worms
- CKing, Apr 10, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 11, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- dhl, Apr 11, 2004
- RE: Sure, it probably isn't the final word....
- CKing, Apr 11, 2004
- Since when did the facts matter to you?
- troy h, Apr 12, 2004
- and I refute your claim that all alterna have silvery-gray irises
- troy h, Apr 12, 2004
- so, why is she now doing mtDNA work herself?
- troy h, Apr 12, 2004
- RE: so, why is she now doing mtDNA work herself?
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: and I refute your claim that all alterna have silvery-gray irises
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- since I've proven him wrong elsewhere . . .
- troy h, Apr 13, 2004
- my point was that YOU WERE WRONG - conclusively demonstrated!
- troy h, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: Immunological data
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: An exception that proves the rule.
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: Since when did the facts matter to you?
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: This is not a desert?
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- you contradict yourself - but thanks for admitting your error!
- troy h, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: If you understand biology...
- CKing, Apr 17, 2004
- An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 11, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- johnscanlon, Apr 13, 2004
- excellent!
- troy h, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 13, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- paalexan, Apr 14, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- johnscanlon, Apr 14, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 15, 2004
- "medieval-minded pedants "
- troy h, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- johnscanlon, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- paalexan, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- paalexan, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- dhl, Apr 15, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- johnscanlon, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: An alternative way to delimit Pseudacris
- CKing, Apr 17, 2004
- Lampropeltis alterna iris color
- CKing, Apr 14, 2004
- RE: Lampropeltis alterna iris color (where is the beef?)
- CKing, Apr 15, 2004
- seems to me that it has now been published
- troy h, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: where is the beef?
- CKing, Apr 16, 2004
- "if you say so, I guess"
- troy h, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: Where is the beef?
- CKing, Apr 16, 2004
- RE: Where is the beef?
- N_natrix, Apr 21, 2004
- FYI: serial troll
- troy h, Apr 15, 2004
- Taxonomic Status of the Santa Monica Mountain Kingsnake
- CKing, Apr 19, 2004
- need everyones opinion
- idioteque4444, Apr 22, 2004
- taxonomic status of Bungarus sp.
- hypnale, Apr 27, 2004
- Tupinambis (Tegu) Taxonomy
- Fakir, Apr 27, 2004
- Lachesis taxonomy and Crotalus durissus........
- Matt Harris, May 26, 2004
- Definitive Pantherophis List
- stevefounduk, Jun 4, 2004
- Current taxonomy: southern pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus)
- metalpest, Jun 7, 2004
- Rattlesnake mimicking a kingsnake?
- CKing, Jun 12, 2004
- Xenopus and Silurana Taxonomy
- xenopusltd, Jun 21, 2004
- Any info. on ,New World Python.........more>
- kennethzweerink, Jul 7, 2004
- Elaphe vulpina gloydi, Elaphe gloydi, or Panterophis gloydi???
- jay w., Jul 16, 2004
- taxonomy on water dragons??? help anyone maybe ingo????
- chong188, Jul 16, 2004
- New python taxa named in a reclassification of the family.
- rayhoser, Jul 20, 2004
- some comments on your paper, Ray (long!)
- Wulf, Jul 22, 2004
- RE: some comments on your paper, Ray (long!)
- WW, Jul 22, 2004
- Broghammerus gen. nov, gets widespread approval
- rayhoser, Aug 2, 2004
- RE: Broghammerus gen. nov, gets widespread approval
- Wulf, Aug 2, 2004
- DNA question
- BGF, Aug 3, 2004
- RE: Broghammerus gen. nov, gets widespread approval
- WW, Aug 3, 2004
- your silence is all the answer we really need.
- BGF, Aug 4, 2004
- RE: reticulatus and molurus
- CKing, Aug 10, 2004
- RE: reticulatus and molurus
- rayhoser, Aug 11, 2004
- Where's the DNA Ray?
- BGF, Aug 12, 2004
- RE: reticulatus and molurus
- CKing, Oct 2, 2004
- Need help finding a link
- HighDesertHerper, Jul 22, 2004
- Elaphe guttata emori or Pantherophis emori?
- mike17l, Jul 29, 2004
- Genetics with taxonomic implications
- RichardFHoyer, Aug 9, 2004
- Taxonomy of Collared Lizards
- all2human, Aug 17, 2004
- Hello to all my friends and Raymond Hoser
- richardwells, Aug 18, 2004
- RE: Hello to all my friends and Raymond Hoser
- wulf, Aug 18, 2004
- Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- rayhoser, Aug 18, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Jan Grathwohl, Aug 19, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Wulf, Aug 20, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Jan Grathwohl, Aug 20, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Wulf, Aug 20, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Jan Grathwohl, Aug 20, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- WW, Aug 20, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Hoplocephalus, Aug 29, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Wulf, Aug 30, 2004
- RE: Richard, when is your planned reptile park opening?
- Hoplocephalus, Aug 30, 2004
- This is ridiculous..
- oldherper, Sep 10, 2004
- RE: This is ridiculous..
- Wulf, Sep 10, 2004
- RE: This is ridiculous..
- oldherper, Sep 10, 2004
- RE: Irony
- CKing, Oct 10, 2004
- RE: This is ridiculous..
- CKing, Oct 12, 2004
- Katrinus - change of view? (For Richard Wells)
- rayhoser, Aug 18, 2004
- The ICZN and Taxonomic Proposals
- CKing, Aug 20, 2004
- Taxonomy of varanids
- all2human, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: Taxonomy of varanids
- mequinn, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: Taxonomy of varanids
- all2human, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: Taxonomy of varanids
- SamSweet, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: Taxonomy of varanids
- mequinn, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: Taxonomy of varanids
- mequinn, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: the problem is
- FR, Sep 27, 2004
- On occaision I ask about current taxonomy of Albigs..
- SHvar, Sep 27, 2004
- A dumb post
- SamSweet, Sep 27, 2004
- RE: On occaision I ask about current taxonomy of Albigs..
- mequinn, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: A dumb post
- EJ, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: A dumb post
- mequinn, Sep 28, 2004
- Question, so I understand...
- mtbker73, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: Question, so I understand...
- mequinn, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: A dumb post
- FR, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: Names
- kap10cavy, Sep 28, 2004
- where common names cause problems
- crocdoc2, Sep 28, 2004
- oops... I meant animals and trees
- crocdoc2, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: Names
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
- Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
About scientific names
- SamSweet, Sep 28, 2004
RE: that sounds familiar
- JPsShadow, Sep 28, 2004
RE: About scientific....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
- hbailey, Sep 28, 2004
On ya Sam, thanks!
- Jeff Lemm, Sep 28, 2004
Pure rudeness
- Dragoon, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Pure rudeness...umm lighten up
- hbailey, Sep 29, 2004
Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
About how taxonomy effects hobbyist.
- FR, Sep 28, 2004
- Falling off the log
- SamSweet, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: about the hobby (people)
- JPsShadow, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: about the hobby (people)
- SamSweet, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: Falling off the log
- mequinn, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: about the hobby (people) & the Scientists
- mequinn, Sep 28, 2004
- RE: about the hobby (people)
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: About how taxonomy effects hobbyist.
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: Not falling, theres no log.
- FR, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: About how taxonomy effects hobbyist.
- crocdoc2, Sep 29, 2004
- He's my monitor
- SamSweet, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: Excellent post Dave!
- Dean, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Ecellent post???
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
RE: about the hobby (people)
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
RE: about the hobby (people) & the Scientists
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
RE: about the hobby (people) & the Scientists
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
RE: about the hobby (people) & the Scientists
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Dave!
- FR, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Frank!
- SamSweet, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Theres a large point your missing Jody
- FR, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Frank!
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
RE: are you arguing about
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
I don't understand your point, Frank
- Dragoon, Sep 29, 2004
RE: I don't understand your point, Frank
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
Nope
- SamSweet, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Frank!
- kap10cavy, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Frank!
- crocdoc2, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Nope
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Excellent post Frank!
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
RE: I don't understand your point, Frank
- FR, Sep 29, 2004
Thank you
- crocdoc2, Sep 29, 2004
I wouldn't have thought this would need explaining, but here goes...
- crocdoc2, Sep 29, 2004
I agree...
- vcreations, Sep 29, 2004
No hope
- SamSweet, Sep 29, 2004
RE: I wouldn't have thought this would need explaining, but here goes...
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
My question and how it efects hobbyists..
- SHvar, Sep 29, 2004
RE: Nope
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
Thats a good post frank
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
RE: My question and how it efects hobbyists..
- mequinn, Sep 29, 2004
RE: DK
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
no problem np
- crocdoc2, Sep 29, 2004
Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
Why put a monitor in a jar....
- SamSweet, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: Why put a monitor in a jar....
- jobi, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: monitors go in boxes, pickles in jars..NP
- kap10cavy, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: Why put a monitor in a jar....
- JPsShadow, Sep 29, 2004
- RE: Why put a monitor in a jar....
- mequinn, Sep 30, 2004
- RE: Mark
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
- Questions
- SamSweet, Sep 30, 2004
- RE: Questions
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
- RE: Questions
- SamSweet, Sep 30, 2004
- Jody
- mequinn, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Questions
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Mark
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
Jody
- mequinn, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Ok so i was right
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
RE: My goodness, and a lesson for Mark
- FR, Sep 30, 2004
I think you missed the point
- RobertBushner, Sep 30, 2004
RE:therapeutical husbandry, really cool, hahahahahahaha, n/p
- FR, Sep 30, 2004
RE:therapeutical husbandry
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
RE: My goodness
- mequinn, Sep 30, 2004
Not really,
- SamSweet, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Thanks
- RobertBushner, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Questions
- crocdoc2, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Yeah DK I got that part
- JPsShadow, Sep 30, 2004
RE: Yeah DK I got that part
- crocdoc2, Sep 30, 2004
Another side to this
- SamSweet, Sep 30, 2004
transplanting CB varanids
- mequinn, Sep 30, 2004
pickling new species
- mequinn, Oct 1, 2004
RE: good idea
- JPsShadow, Oct 1, 2004
Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- FR, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- jobi, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- Dragoon, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- EJ, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- EJ, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: Again, taxonomy and hobbyist.
- JPsShadow, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: nice niles steeve
- JPsShadow, Oct 1, 2004
- hey Dragoon
- crocdoc2, Oct 1, 2004
- RE: hey Dragoon
- crocdoc2, Oct 1, 2004
- I'll take a stab at this...
- mtbker73, Oct 2, 2004
- And a good stab it is...
- EJ, Oct 2, 2004
RE: nice example and good pics
- FR, Oct 2, 2004
RE:Something to consider
- FR, Oct 2, 2004
RE: And a good stab it is...
- jobi, Oct 3, 2004
Discussion moved: Monitors forum.
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
"Taxonomy" for Hobbyists
- tomas, Oct 2, 2004
umm, you forgot to mention that some taxonomists don't recognize ssp. n/p
- EJ, Oct 2, 2004
subspecies and time....
- mequinn, Oct 3, 2004
RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists
- bloodbat, Oct 3, 2004
RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists = beautiful examples Bloodbat
- mequinn, Oct 3, 2004
hahaha
- vcreations, Oct 3, 2004
RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
RE: lets not confuse two methods of naming
- JPsShadow, Oct 3, 2004
Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
Korzybski quotes! awesome!
- snakepimp, Jan 23, 2005
Thanks for the conversation on taxonomy for hobbyist, I had a epiphany
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
- a line in the sand.
- mtbker73, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: a line in the sand.
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: subspecies and races
- JPsShadow, Oct 3, 2004
- DNA will be very helpful to taxonomy, for a while
- tomas, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: subspecies and races
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: DNA will be very helpful to taxonomy, for a while
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
- I just wish you would answer your phone
- tomas, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: Thanks for the conversation on taxonomy for hobbyist, I had a epiphany
- mequinn, Oct 3, 2004
- EXCELLENT POST -
- mequinn, Oct 3, 2004
- Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
The problem with the discussions below on taxo and others such topics.
- FR, Oct 3, 2004
- The naming of monitors...
- amaxim, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: The problem with the discussions below on taxo and others such topics.
- jobi, Oct 3, 2004
- I see another problem with the Taxo discussions of late.
- mtbker73, Oct 3, 2004
- RE: actually names change for them too
- JPsShadow, Oct 3, 2004
- Poor poor jack...
- amaxim, Oct 3, 2004
- Actually some latin names translate direstly to common names...
- SHvar, Oct 3, 2004
- That's about it
- SamSweet, Oct 3, 2004
- part answer to your question
- crocdoc2, Oct 4, 2004
- Discussion moved: Monitors forum
- phwyvern, Oct 5, 2004
Pogona
- AlteredMind99, Oct 18, 2004
- RE: Pogona
- Wulf, Oct 18, 2004
- RE: Pogona
- Scott Eipper, Oct 19, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- richardwells, Oct 19, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- AlteredMind99, Oct 20, 2004
- Books...
- Scott Eipper, Oct 21, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- richardwells, Oct 21, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- CKing, Oct 22, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- richardwells, Oct 23, 2004
- RE: On the Genus Pogona Storr, 1982
- CKing, Oct 23, 2004
- Molecules, Systematics and the Meaning of Life
- richardwells, Oct 23, 2004
- RE: Molecules, Systematics and the Meaning of Life
- CKing, Oct 24, 2004
- RE: Pogona Storr, 1982
- CKing, Nov 3, 2004
- RE: Pogona Storr, 1982
- WW, Nov 3, 2004
- RE: Pogona Storr, 1982
- CKing, Nov 5, 2004
Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- Wulf, Oct 24, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- CKing, Oct 24, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- WW, Oct 25, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- Wulf, Oct 25, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- Wulf, Oct 26, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- WW, Oct 26, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- WW, Oct 26, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- CKing, Oct 28, 2004
- RE: Species concepts and typological thinking
- CKing, Oct 29, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- CKing, Oct 29, 2004
- RE: Though, what is it, that makes a taxonomic proposal widely accepted?
- ScottThomson, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- CKing, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- ScottThomson, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- CKing, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- Wulf, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- ScottThomson, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- CKing, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- CKing, Nov 5, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- WW, Nov 8, 2004
- RE: The role of morphology in systematics
- CKing, Nov 8, 2004
Page: 1 2 3 |
