The anticipation that my light female was a morph was a rather
premature speculation. I must apologize for this mistake. I have recently
been more properly informed concerning the history of the parents to this nice
female.
In fact thats what she is, more than likely just a very nice female.

The reason being, her parents are assumed to be a pure blood line that were
direct imports from Australia to VPI. Since the early 80s (maybe 70’s) no childrens
pythons have been imported into the US from Australia except to a few zoo's
here and there and they sign contracts saying the offspring will not be
released to the public.
Heres a pic of the mother to my female.

Many of the childrens lines have been outcrossed with spotteds, because
early on they were all considered the same snake, just a little
different looking. I think VPI kept theirs pure, as far as they knew.
This is my likely impure male with my VPI female.

My female probably looks so nice because Im comparing it to an impure
blood line. (my dark male???)

I guess theres a good reason the other name for childrens python is the
"faded python".



It would be more appropriate to assume that the babies in this clutch may likely be rather light or rather dark.
Thank you to all for understanding. I truly had no intention of
misleading anyone. Was a little over zealous and now I stand corrected.
Thanks
Brendan
-----
And God said to Noah,"Let there be plenty of room for the serpents".
--not doctrine--



