First let start off by saying what I think both of you are saying and by the way I completely agree with is when it is possible to buy a captive born animal they are the best possible choice for most keepers, new or old.
Second I agree that in past years and even today in the case of some animals such as tortises, turtles, limited habitat animals and even a few common snakes ( such as Ball pythons) collecting has been detrimental to local populations.
We have all seen it in some areas with certain reptiles. A good example is the total destruction (rock flipping)I have seen out in California in the quest for mt. kings, in La. in the quest for La. Milks (bark stripping) and in Florida and Texas with the gassing of tortise etc. holes for rattlers etc.
These type practices are without a doubt reprehensible and something we should all be ashamed of when we see it and let it go without negative for the people responsible.
Additionally let me flatly state that for 75% of the reptile/amphibians in the USA commercial collection should not be allowed. But there are some exceptions and thsoe excpetions are identified by biologist and professionals on a regular basis.
I can also say that recreational collecting does not effect the wild populations as a whole which many have feared in the past.
I base this on a number of sources, but one particular source would my experience with the Texas Dept. Of Fish & Wildlife. Here in my state of Texas I served on a study group for Non-Game species. This was conducted by the Texas Parks & WildLife Dept. Regulations were imposed and licenses required for three years running, part of the regulations was to report and catalog the numbers of animals collectted by herpers and non-herpers alike. What we found after compiling all the data for the three years was that some species such as rattlers a few turtles of several dfferent kinds were being impacted by the total take from things such as rattlesnake round ups and meat collecting. The rattlers and a few other species that we found to be impacted by harvest were left on a protected list and even today studies are continuing to determine proper management of them.
The rest of the reptiles in the State were de-listed because the take was so small, that the wildlife biologist for the state and the state herptologist felt the wild population were not being effected. This was great news for herpers in the State of Texas and for the general public also.
Don't get me wrong there are still some animals that need protection such as the Texas Desert Tortises and the Texas Indigo as examples. Those were afforded protection and special handling. Plus the others I mentioned above are still be studied as I said. In the next few years we should have comphrehensive further management of them.
Our state address things in the following manner and I like the approach. If an animal whatever it is a reptile, fish, mammal, or bird is a renewable resource that can allow people to utilize the resource without damaging the wild population then they allow it. If taking for any reason hurts the wild population and its ability to be there for future generations they do not allow it. Additionally there are several steps in between with things such as limited take or certain areas of allowed take and in other areas no take. This makes good sense to me.
Bottom Line for me is that responsible use of our wildlife resource I have no problem with . Additionally in some cases it is best for the wildlife, as it brings to the forefront the management of that particular species. And history has proven when people experience the animals they keep in the wild they have a more complete knowledge of that animals needs and whats. A winning situation for both the "Keeper and The Kept" to coin a pharse from one of our departed brothers.
On the other hand when it comes to captive born reptiles as versus wild caught reptiles for me, I will always choose the captive borns hands down. For all the reasons plus many more that I referred to in my previous post. To carry this one step further I do not participate as a vendor at any show or expo that does not have a captive bred only policy in effect. But there are cases where a wild caught animal is the only or best option ( genetics etc.) and then I have no problem with the taking of that animal.
Enough of my rambling,
John Cherry
Cherryville Farms

Cherryville Farms