Its not a matter of what the Animal Rights (AR) groups think. We all know what they think, and that is ultimately - No one (including academia- ie zoo,lab,research) should ever own, control, utilize, inflict, or depend upon ANY animal. Exotics including reptiles are merely stepping stones towards their long term agenda of no captive animals.
What I feel we should closely watch is what we give them to twist. They do not see accounts of mistakes as a learning source, only as written first person testimony to "this is why the private owners should not have these".
Unfortunately presenting to legislators and representatives is not at all like a court room. Fact is not key. Heresay accounts and newspaper articles are admissable as factual information and statistics!! In a court room these do not count.
This thread asked for accounts of instances, not hypotheticals. I do not find it offensive to ask this and agree it is informative, and the problems are already stirred up. What is precedent is not providing them (AR's) with first hand accounts for them to twist. We are fighting a dirty war, legislative process does not mandate true fact to support validation. If all data had to factual, then these laws would not be nearly as common.
I would love it if the AR groups would publicly discuss/post their mistakes/weak points, practices, and less than legal tactics for all to see. It would definately make fighting their agendas easier.
I agree learning from others is a major facet of developing a solid knowledge. Instances like these do need discussed for others to learn by, but we must take care in how we present it. Unfortunately I believe that fighting and guarding against agendas has now become a constant in our lives with reptiles, and as such we are now required to be evermore aware of ourselves. Maybe physical herp societys need to start again, where individuals can meet, hang out, tell the stories, and so on. Hot guys meet hot guys (sounds odd), constrictors to constictors and so on. Im sure some will say well that can be infiltrated, but its much harder to pose in person then from a keyboard.
AR groups did not stereotype us, they only arranged the information to better promote it. We were stereotyped by those irresponsible keepers and the individuals who did not care so much about the animal as much as for their own images. Be it lg constrictors to venomous, those forementioned were the ones who ultimately created the stereotype.
So that is my expansion on the subject. Hope its something to think about for all.
Notah
>>Just to make this clear, please don't think anything i'm saying is an attack on any of you.
>>
>>I feel that this is something that is really wrong w/our society. What has happened to us? Why are we all afraid of what PETA thinks? This group is responsible for more half-assed, insane ideas than anything i have ever seen. The vast majority of the world thinks of them as a bunch of crazy hippies w/nothing better to do than complain about every little thing. I'm all for the ethical treatment of animals, but these people are just plain stupid. For every good thing they do, they do 10 crazy as hell things. I'm just so sick of "walking on eggshells" as not to offend or stir up any problems. They have no right to tell us what to do or anything like that. I understand that you guys don't want to give them anymore ammo, but this is exactly why our society is going to crap, everything is too politically correct and everyone is afraid they are going to offend someone. This is just my 2 cents....it's just really sad that we can't even speak our own minds w/out looking over our shoulders....