..on about 3 or 4 accounts.
Orange subocs don't eat any more lizards than tan or gray or purple-spotted or mother-of-pearl ones do!!! LOL!
You're killing me, Smalls. LOL
Again...back to the chalkboard...color is naturally selected for when that color is cryptic or when it is the same color as the substrate. Ever heard of Charles Darwin? Contrary to what some may say, he was a pretty clever boy.
THAT is why there are red/orange subocs on (go figure) red/orange dirt.
Directly from Werler and Dixon's "Texas Snakes" book (2000) on pg. 66, it reads, "Adults of this species consume mostly small mammals, some birds, and EVEN FEWER lizards."
Later, it goes on to show the findings from an OFFICIALLY PUBLISHED article (the word 'credible' comes to mind when I see those two capitalized words together) in a scientific herp journal by Reynolds and Scott where they examined the contents of the stomachs of many wild subocs.
Their diet was 83.3% rodents and 16.7% birds. Hmmm...my calculator says that those two numbers equal 100%. How about that!
That means the lizard diet of ALL the wild subocs they surveyed was a whopping 0%.
Man! Isn't it truly amazing when you go to **ACTUAL** sources of verified scientific information to find the truth?! What a marvelous modern concept!
Dusty R.
Suboc.com