I do not feel that my question deserved such a venomous flaming. I do not believe that I was passing any information, I was simply asking a question. After all, isn't this hobby about asking questions, sharing information, and learning?
If it were not for Ingo sharing a link with us on this forum a while back I would not have asked this question at all. Yes, I, of all people know that MHDs lose horns due to rough handling. However, I also know that usually there is a scar where the horn was. The place where the horn was is not usually smooth and eveny scaled. There is usually a circle of raised scales, the ones that form the base of the horn, still remaining after the horn is broken off. In these specimens this doesn't seem to be the case.
The link to the thread that Ingo posted in is forums.kingsnake.com/view.php?id=1035285,1041602 and the link he posted is www.foto.fm/albums/detailalbum.html?album=5016.
Now, normally I would not consider these to be another species either. However, should these animals be bred, and should the offspring develop without horns as well, even you would have to admit that they are not the normal capra.
So, just as you have not given proof that my little MHDs are crucigera other than that your collectors say so, I cannot give any proof that these hornless MHDs are anything other than damaged capra. I do know that crucigera are named so for the cross on the neck, my small MHDs do not have a cross on the neck and therefor do not fit that description. If you are correct then who misnamed them I do not know. When it is straghtened out I will call them by the correct name.
I do not feel that I deserved the put down that I got here. You have told me in the past to not take offense at what you have said but you continue to say such mean things. I may not be as educated as you but I have learned a lot about these little animals. I have not done so for prosperity, for financial gains, or for fame. I have only done so for the love of the animal and out of personal interest.
In the future, if you choose to disagree with me, that is fine. I don't expect anyone to ever agree with me, or anyone all of the time. But I don't understand why you have to be so arrogant that you think you are the only one who is right and that everyone else is beneigh you.
You came to this board asking questions at one time and everyone was kind and polite with you. Lately you have been curt and unkind.
You stated "However we should not liberally pass on such information, at least not without farther knowledge. I am not new in this field, iv seen my share of living room taxonomist. These do nothing for this hobby, its all about greed in the race for nomenclature. In recent years many new species have been named after second hand dealers, hobbyist, arm chair scientist or there wife, data have been published on hear say or by information provided by keepers without first hand experience, none or very little studies have been conducted in the field and most locality data was inaccurate."
I did no such thing. I simply asked a question. I am not asking that a species be named. If I wanted to see a new species name I have seen some really striking MHD photos that would be of much more interest than that.
On the other hand, I do know that MHDs have been imported for decades. Until 8 years ago they were considered fragile, nervous animals that were ill suited for capive care. Until 2000 they were considered not suited for captive breeding and the breeder column in Reptiles Magazine stated that they could not be captive bred. I also know that I changed that. I sometimes wonder whether or not that is a good thing, but none the less, I, an hobbyist with no experience with any reptile breeding, went out and bought a group of 1.2 A. capra and proceeded to figure out the correct way to keep them and they bred and hatched and prospered.
I may not be the god of all things reptile but I am not an idiot and I don't deserve to be made fun of.
-----
Marcia - FroggieB Dragons
www.froggieb.com/MHDHome.html