Hi,
Just wanted to see what the general consensus was on the issue of taking animals from the wild. More specifically, you see a lot of people who feel that they are rescuing animals that they find in areas where there is a lot of residential or industrial development. I’m not saying that this is necessarily a bad thing, but I’m just wondering how the rest of you feel. For myself, I no longer take animals in no matter what the situation. I feel that permanently removing any animal from the wild damages population viability to some extent. I have read the studies on survival rates of transplanted animals, but I feel even if the animal only has a slim chance of making it, at least there is a small chance it can reproduce and bolster the numbers of wild animals. In captivity, that same animal is as good as dead to the breeding pool.
With the incredible pressures that wildlife faces today, I think it’s best to take a hands off policy, no matter how slim that animals hopes seem if left alone, or if absolutely necessary, moved to a new location and released. There is enough of a supply of captive bred animals out there to support the serious pet market. True, they may cost more, but that is a good thing in my mind as it means they will more likely be properly cared for.
So, at least in my opinion, there is never a good reason to permanently remove an animal from the wild.


