It's been quite a while, how have things been? Thank you for the added information, it makes perfect sense. With that being said, I could possibly see why it would be much easier to use the rope and restrain method, although in the end it would be much more stressful for the animal. Why would Mr. Irwin consider tranquilization to be any different than providing a vaccination? I have seen him sedate animals before, so why would during the capturing of a crocodilian be any different? Doesn't seem like he has that very well thought out.
I hope all is well with you Izzy!
Chris
>>This deals mostly with expertise. A procedure of having the proper drug, having an expert present who is sharp enough to determine tranquilizer dosage based on body weight, and expert handlers to care for the animal when it is tranquilized, is paramount. Part of avoiding drowning the animal involves keeping it away from water, keeping it bound to a tree as it wakes, keeping it in the shade so the heat doesn't overwhelm its metabolism while tranquilized, etc.
>>
>>One should note that one of Irwin's reasons for not injecting crocs deals with his distaste for 'polluting' an animals body with drugs. What's worse than polluting the animal is killing it. I don't know Irwin's kill record - perhaps he's never lost one from capture stress, perhaps he has lost many. It is doubtful one could ever know, as he guards his image as an 'expert' very carefully.
>>-----
>>Israel Dupont
>>Winter Haven, FL
-----
U.A.P.P.E.A.L.
Uniting A Proactive Primate and Exotic Animal League
www.uappeal.org