This is my theory. It holds for counties such as Val Verde and Terrell where there are numerous rock cuts frequently hunted. It is a different situation in Brewster/Presido/Jeff Davis counties.
In Jeff Davis and Brewster there are cuts which are hunted and which produce, but they don't have the vast numbers of collectors which are found in other areas.
Think of the rock cuts by the roads as artificial reefs, created by man and totally unnatural. Over the years the rains have washed out some if the dirt from the fissures, giving animals a place to live. It was a marvellous place for rodents, lizards, snakes and other animals to live. They were micro-habitats.
In the 70's there were plenty of alterna to be found, and most of them were found on the pavement. There was very little spotlighting in the 70's.
From the late 70's through '86 they were protected. They were still found in good numbers, but there were far fewer collectors coming down because of the possibility of stiff fines.
In the 90's the heavy hunting was once again in full swing. People were driving and spotlighting, many were walking the cuts. Some areas, such as Palma Draw and Hwy. 277 had been hunted moderately or lightly and were still loaded with critters. In the early 90's both areas began to be hunted heavily. Often there were 7-10 cars hunting a 7 mile stretch around Palma Draw and Lozier Canyon. It was nothing to see 12-18 cars on Hwy. 277 hunting the 19 miles from Carruthers Creek to Buffalo Creek. On 277 they were pulling off great numbers of large snakes. 34-36" females and 36-40" males were not uncommon.
Ten to Twenty years ago the annual alterna take statewide was probably 170-225 snakes. Now it is probably 50-60.
My theory is that these "artificial reefs" have been overcollected. In part it is due to the increased traffic; twenty years ago the only traffic on Hwy. 90 or Hwy. 377 after dark was herpers or the occasional rancher heading home. Now it is constant traffic, much of it 18 wheelers and few snakes can go on the road and make it off again.
They main reason though is the overcollection. The breeding stock which had had many years to establish itself had been taken away. It takes time for new breeding stock to establish itself, and they don't have the opportunity. Even the small stuff is taken, not given a chance to grow to adulthood and reproduce itself.
I'm not pointing fingers or giving blame, just stating what I see as the primary reason for fewer snakes being taken.
These wonderful animals cover a range of perhaps 50,000 sq. miles and we are basically hunting 100 miles of 60' wide highway. While we are not affecting overall numbers, we are decimating small localized areas. Don't blame it on the weather. Those who have been there for 20-30 years know that there are annual variations, but the populations have always been there. Val Verde and Terrell counties are coming off several years of good rains. If it were the weather, the snakes would be there now.
Is there anything to be done about it? Who knows. Perhaps the lack of snakes and the increased cost of finding them will result in fewer hunters putting in less time - this should help.
With that said, good luck and good herping.
Herping The Trans Pecos




