This is in response to the website posted by Hermann a couple of posts down. The one that spewed the idiotic idea of the goverment acutally planning the attacks.
I don't know how many members here have avaition experience,but i'll try to explain some things that made that website to worthless.
I might be getting a little off the current topic, but i wanted to explain this to anyone who might be buying that website's filth.
1. "The terrorists would not have been able to pilot the Boeing because they didn't have enough experience." Here's the deal, flying a plane once it's in the air isn't really all that difficult. It was quoted in the website that the hijackers were dubbed not able to solo in a single-engine plane. The difference between keeping an already airborne plane straight-and-level and soloing a single engine is the difference between keeping a boa and keeping hots. All the hijackers had to do was find their destination and wait for gravity to take over.
2. "The goverment had a phantom plane, that merged on the real plane's flight path, so the radar controllers couldn't tell a switch had been made" Ok, this idea is stupid on multiple levels. #1--You can't just run two planes together and expect nothing to happen! The controllers would be having a freakin heart attack. They'd be calling both planes, trying to vector them around, alarms would be going off, reports would be filed on the controllers end...basically nothing short of chaos. And what, do you think the controllers watch two planes run into each other and then go back to sipping coffee??? #2.--You can't just sub in one plane for another! Planes are given specific identification codes for each flight they make. This code shows up on the controllers screen along with the 'dot' that represents the plane. So theoretically (sp) even if it was possible to fly two planes on the same flight path (which you can't) the controller would see the numbers and know that something was up. And no, it isn't possible to 'steal' the other plane's identifier code.
3. "Why didn't the pilots fight back?" This is something that a lot of people have asked. The answer is simple..THEY HAD NO ROOM!! Cockpits are not a spacious place. Once you manage to squeeze yourself into the seat, then strangle yourself trying to get buckled, you quite literally don't have any room. I'm a 5'4" 123lb female, and I have trouble squeezing into cockpits. If someone comes at you from behind, you're screwed. plain and simple. Bless their souls, those pilots would have only been able to land MAYBE a good punch before their time was up.
There are some other aviation issues i could address in that website, but i'm sure whoever reading this is bored enough as it is.
To the person who asked for our opinions, thank you for your sensitivity to the issue. What do i think about the conspiracy theory? It's a load of filth. Why wasn't there any debris? You don't run a jet that large into a building that large at 350-400mph and expect to find pieces of the fuelage intact! There was a website someone posted a link to that did show pieces of the airplane on the lawn of the pentagon.
And just to wrap up how i really feel about the topic, here is something i found on a website....
"You know the world has gone crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is black, France is accusing us of arrogance, and Germany doesn't want to go to war."
Have a good day everyone