Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Calling Kathy L. and Don S., and anyone

John Q Jul 22, 2006 09:22 AM

Hopefully Kathy and Don will have time to respond but I'd like to hear from anyone that has a good grasp of genetics and LOTS of experience.
We just had an unexplainable outcome with one of our projects.
First we acquired an unknown sub-adult female. Looks amber (hypo and caramel) but slightly different than your typical amber. We have a hypo male that is also high yellow.

First year breeding.
Hypo hy male X Amber looking female
All the hatchlings are hypo and as they mature you can see that some look just like dad and some like mom. Hypos with more yellow.
We also breed Hypo hy male X Hypo (with typical amounts of yellow, orange, and red) All the babies are hypo and as they mature they look better than average but not quite as much yellow as the other clutch from the Hypo hy male X Amber looking female.

Second year breeding.
Caramel male X Amber looking female
Half the babies come out looking normal and half the babies coming out looking caramel. Odd result because if mom is caramel and hypo you would expect all caramels het for hypo. Some caramels indicates that mom may be a new type of caramel that may not be fully compatible with the standard caramel gene?

Third year breeding.
No males from the first year are up to size and we are not interested in creating more caramels like the male that was used in the second year of breeding. So we cycle the female. She comes out of cooling, gets as much as she wants to eat but no exposure to a male. She drops a full clutch of 14 eggs, all infertile. We are delighted because we are trying to eliminate sperm retention as part of the puzzle. I can't say it is a gurantee but I would have expected some fertile eggs if she had retained sperm.

Fourth year breeding.
The survivors, best looking hatchlings from the first year breeding have matured and are up to size. Prior to cooling the group is split between myself and a good friend. The original female remains with me.
Hypo high yellow son X Amber looking female = 14 egg clutch. Incubator mishap, screw up on my part, and the whole clutch is lost. We wait another year on this one.

2 females from the very first clutch are bred to one of their brothers. All 3 are hypo and all 3 are high yellow.
First clutch is Sibling X Sibling = ALL NORMALS Yes, you read it right. They all came out looking normal. No hypo, No high yellow. These look like typical normal corns.
We are still waiting on the second clutch.
Very important to note that in the time that these females were being raised they NEVER spend a single moment with another male. Not during box cleaning, moving racks, cleaning, etc. NEVER a single moment exposed to any male.

How could all the hatchlings from this first clutch not be hypo?
Both parents/siblings that were bred are hypo and at the very least they should be het for caramel. Look back to the second year breeding. Half the babies looked like mom and half looked like dad that was a recessive gene caramel. The original females high yellow look was somewhat compatible with the that males caramel gene.

Any explanation for how this could happen?

Replies (5)

STEVES_KIKI Jul 22, 2006 10:30 AM

magic? j/k i know it wasnt intended for me. but its very interesting!!

~kin
-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~SNAKIES~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Corns:
.1 Normal (Gertrude)
1. unknown hypo? normal? (Romeo)
1.2 Miami Phase (Hector, Emily, Charlotte) thanks jeff!
1. Amel het Blizzard (Dunesbury)
1. Classic het Hypo, poss het Amel, Anery (Cobra)
1.1 Classics (Henry VIII, Cassy [Emilys babies])
.1 Amel (Pepperoni)
1.1 Hypo zig zags poss het Caramel (Bernard, Abegail)
.1 Classic het Hypo, Stripe (Gracie Lou)
1.1 Anery het Motley (Lleroy, Persia)

Rats:
1.1 Black rats (Willard, Cecily)

Cal Kings:
1.1 Striped Cal Kings (Dweezil, Skunky)

Other:
0.0.1 Worm Snake

~~~~~~~~~~~~~LEOPARD GECKOS~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. Normal het Midnight Blizzard (Mr. Spot)
0.0 Blizzard (Blitz) RIP....STUPID CAT ATE HER

~~~~~~~~~~~~~TURTLES~~~~~~~~~~~~
.1 white cheeked mud (Opel)
.1 snapping turtle (no name)

Kat Jul 22, 2006 12:21 PM

Part of the problem with the pairings you listed is that it's very easy to 'fake' the hypo and the caramel look. That is, cornsnakes which are not homozygous for either can still appear to be hypo or caramel. Some breeders will even sell yellowish corns as caramels, even when they are het or don't carry the gene. With that in mind...

What you observed:

Year 1
Hypo X Amber = Hypos, yellow hypos
Hypo X Hypo = Hypos

Year 2
Caramel X Amber = Normals, Caramels

Year 4
F1 yellow hypo X F1 yellow hypo = Normals

Right off the bat, Year 2 tells us something. Year 2 tells us that your "Amber" is really only het for Caramel. This is probably the result of a breeder seeing a yellowish normal or hypo and mistaking it for a true caramel as a hatchling.

Secondly, year 4 tells us that the "Amber" is not homozygous for hypo. If she were, F1 X F1 would equal 100% hypos. The father's state as being a hypo is now also suspect, but Murphy may just be messing with your clutch ratios. (You didn't say how large the year 4 clutch was.) The other thing that the Year 4 breeding tells us, is that the yellow-hypo look does not breed true. Ergo, it is not a new morph or anything.

So what we have:
"Amber" -- Really just a Normal het caramel that looks yellow enough and light enough to fake being homozygous for caramel and hypo.
"Hypo" -- Probably hypo, assuming the hypo X hypo offspring were correctly identified.
"High-yellow hypo F1s" -- Het hypo, with some pretty coloration that does not breed true in the offspring. Neither, both, or just one may be het caramel.

Now this is all given that your identification of the hatchlings' morphs is correct, obviously. But that's what my deductions are at current.

-Kat
-----
This Space For Rent

John Q Jul 22, 2006 12:43 PM

Thanks for taking a shot at it. It is a puzzling result. There is still a second clutch this year from the siblings and that may answer some questions.

I say wrong because there is absolutely no confusing the hypo gene of the amber looking female and the male hypo. The male hypo sired another clutch the same year. Bred to a female hypo and all the hatchlings were hypos. Very nice ones at that. So he is definitely a hypo.
So following your theory theory let's say the amber female fooled everybody. The hatchlings would still be het for hypo from their fathers hypo gene. Het x het siblings from the very first clutch, only 25% visual/homozygous with the rest being 66% het for hypo. It was a small clutch, about 8 I believe. So in a clutch of 8 it could happen but this would all have to happen in contradiction to the 2nd year breeding of the amber female that produced some visual caramels. The siblings that were bred should have also been het for that gene.

Kat Jul 23, 2006 08:29 PM

So in a clutch of 8 it could happen but this would all have to happen in contradiction to the 2nd year breeding of the amber female that produced some visual caramels. The siblings that were bred should have also been het for that gene.

Ahh, but your amber produced only 50% caramels when bred to your caramel. The other half were normals. So your amber can at most be het for caramel. Therefore every hatchling from the Amber X Hypo clutch is only 50% possible het caramel. There is ZERO guarantee that the F1 pair you crossed is even het for caramel. Given that you got all normals in the F2s, you've either got bad odds, or at most one of the F1s is het caramel, and the other is definitely not.

-Kat
-----
This Space For Rent

shaky Jul 23, 2006 09:51 PM

Four years ago, not many breeders knew anything about the 'other' hypo genes.
Could this be the case here?
-----
...and I think to myself, "What a wonderful world."

Site Tools