Anyone have a preference one way or the other? Monster says to only feed that, but I dont like that idea. I picked up a can of monster while I wait for more Mazuri to come in.
Its for a hermanns
Thanks
Reptile & Amphibian Forums
Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.
Monster VS. Mazuri
zookeepnhippie
Aug 07, 2006 10:58 PM
Replies (2)
bradtort
Aug 08, 2006 09:28 AM
>>Anyone have a preference one way or the other? Monster says to only feed that, but I dont like that idea. I picked up a can of monster while I wait for more Mazuri to come in.
>>Its for a hermanns
>>
>>Thanks
>>
I looked up the info on Monster, and they seemed to have the same basic type of ingredients and feeding instructions as the other pellets I've tried.
I reverse the feeding directions: feed mostly fresh foods (weeds and greens, for example) and use the pellets as an occasional item. I've used Mazuri, RepCal and now Pretty Pets. I think it's better to offer as wide a variety as possible and that using pellets all the time severely cuts down on that variety.
805Ringo
Aug 24, 2006 08:23 PM
Feed both with alternating standards- I use both to keep variety and nutrition maintained. It's like good dog foods, sometimes you get whats on sale, convience. Mazuri has the history of being used with the Galop torts development, and I have success with Monsters too.
